-
Recent Posts
Search
Welcome to DCW
Upcoming Events
7/15/24 - GOP Convention
TBD - Democratic Convention
11/5/24 - Election DayTools
Archives
Tag Cloud
2008 Democratic National Convention 2012 Democratic National Convention 2012 Republican National Convention 2016 Democratic National Convention 2016 Republican National Convention 2020 Census 2020 Democratic Convention 2024 Democratic Convention 2024 Republican Convention Abortion Affordable Care Act Alabama Arizona Bernie Sanders California Colorado Donald Trump First Amendment Florida Free Exercise Clause Free Speech Georgia Hillary Clinton Immigration Iowa Joe Biden Kansas Maine Marco Rubio Michigan Missouri Nevada New Hampshire North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania redistricting South Carolina Supreme Court Ted Cruz Texas United Kingdom Virginia Voting Rights Act WisconsinDCW in the News
Blog Roll
Site Info
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- tmess2 on Election Recap
- Anthony Uplandpoet Watkins on Election Recap
- Anthony Uplandpoet Watkins on Election Recap
- DocJess on Don’t think we’re getting a contested convention
- Matt on Dems to nominate Biden early to avoid GOP Ohio nonsense
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- August 2012
- November 2011
- August 2011
- January 2011
- May 2010
- January 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Categories
- 2019-nCoV
- 2020 Convention
- 2020 General Election
- 2020DNC
- 2024 Convention
- 2028 Convention
- Anti-Semitism
- Bernie Sanders
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Civil Rights
- Cleveland
- Climate Change
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Tips
- COVID-19
- Debates
- Delegate Count
- Delegates
- Democratic Debates
- Democratic Party
- Democrats
- DemsinPhilly
- DemsInPHL
- Disaster
- DNC
- Donald Trump
- Economy
- Elections
- Electoral College
- Federal Budget
- Freedom of the Press
- General Election Forecast
- GOP
- Healthcare
- Hillary Clinton
- Holidays
- Hotels
- House of Representatives
- Houston
- Identity Politics
- Impeachment
- Iowa Caucuses
- Jacksonville
- Joe Biden
- Judicial
- LGBT
- Mariner Pipeline
- Merrick Garland
- Meta
- Milwaukee
- Money in Politics
- Music
- National Security
- Netroots Nation
- New Yor
- New York
- NH Primary
- Notes from Your Doctor
- NoWallNoBan
- Pandemic
- Philadelphia
- PHLDNC2016
- Platform
- Politics
- Polls
- Presidential Candidates
- Primary and Caucus Results
- Primary Elections
- Public Health
- Rant
- Republican Debates
- Republicans
- Resist
- RNC
- Russia
- Senate
- Snark
- Student Loan Debt
- Sunday with the Senators
- Superdelegates
- Syria
- The Politics of Hate
- Uncategorized
- Vaccines
- War
- Weekly White House Address
Meta
Monthly Archives: November 2024
Immigration
The Republicans have made immigration a big issue in the past several election cycles. When Democrats were in the White House, Democrats had an incentive to reach a global agreement with Republicans to try to fix a broken system. Trump, however, has zero interest in fixing the system. He wants mass deportations. Democrats have no incentive to cooperate with this concept of a plan.
The important thing to understand is that there is not a single immigration problem. There are multiple immigration problems.
The one of least concern to Republicans is with the legal immigration system. Depending on job skills and country of origin, a potential immigrant can be on a waiting list for several years. People who think they would be better off in the U.S. but are being told to wait six or seven years are likely to try other, not legal, methods to get to the U.S.
Remaining Races and Recounts (UPDATED 11-23)
Votes are still being counted, particularly out west where mail-in ballots are the predominate form of voting. But we are down to a handful of races that are still too close to call.
There are three things to consider at this point. The first is how many ballots remain to be processed and where those ballots are. The second is that Alaska uses ranked-choice voting. While the U.S. does not have much experience with ranked-choice voting, Australia does. The Australian experience has taught us is that second and third choices tend to be for the candidate closest to the first choice but there will be some drop off and a minority will go to the “non-similar” candidate. As such, it is hard for a trailing candidate to close the gap much, and the trailing candidate usually wins only if the original margin is small, there are a significant number of votes for the “also-ran” candidates. Third, the vote counting machines are very accurate. There will be some voter errors that are only caught by visual inspection, but recounts rarely change the final count by much. Closing a 1,000 vote margin in a recount is almost impossible.
Turning to what is still outstanding, depending on the media site that you use, the only outstanding Senate race is Pennsylvania. The real issue in Pennsylvania is provisional ballots. The current margin is 18,000. Senator Bob Casey is receiving about 60% of the vote from provisional ballots so far, and most of the remaining provisional ballots are in areas that favor Senator Casey. There will be a recount, but, as noted above, it is unlikely that the recount will change the vote total by more than 1,000. Senator Casey’s chances depend entirely on how many additional provisional ballots are counted.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives, Senate
Tagged Alaska, Bob Casey, California, Donald Trump, Freedom Caucus, Jared Golden, Jim Costa, John Duarte, Maine, Marcy Kaptur, Marianne Miller-Meeks, Mary Peltola, Michelle Steel, Mike Johnson, Nick Begich, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Sarah Palin
Leave a comment
Election Recap
Needless to say, the election did not go the way that many had hoped. But it’s important to take a clear look at the numbers. It is always hard to tell for sure, and it varies from state-to-state, but it looks like in the swing states, the issue is more voters who were willing to vote for Joe Biden in 2020 were not willing to vote for Kamala Harris. How much of that is based on inflation and myopic hindsight (thinking the Trump years were better than they actually were) and how much on other factors is unclear.
Looking at the individual states, in Georgia, there were 243,000 additional votes this year. In Michigan, it looks like something on the order of 71,000 more votes were cast this year than in 2020. In Nevada, there were about 28,000 more votes this year. In North Carolina, there were about 177,000 more votes this year. In Pennsylvania, there were about 5,000 additional votes. In Wisconsin, there were about 86,000 additional votes. While we do not have the final numbers from Arizona, the reports seem to suggest that the final count will end up with around the same number of votes. Even if we end up with fewer votes, it looks like it will be within 100,000 of the 2020 totals. In short, in the swing states, while almost certainly some people who voted in 2020 did not vote in 2024, they were more than replaced by additional voters. Admittedly, within the states, we had some shortfall in the areas where we are strongest, the loss is not entirely due to Democrats not voting.
But people who are saying that the Democrats need major changes are missing the story of this election. There is a lot of economic pain in the country even though, at the general level, the economy is in decent shape. Since the Republicans do not have a sound economic plan, we are likely to see several elections in which the White House keeps flipping back and forth.
Electoral College Anachronism
As the final day of this election dawns, we are looking at the real probability that Democrats will win the popular vote for the eighth time in the last nine elections. There is also a significant chance that, once again, the Republicans are going to win the electoral college vote despite losing the popular vote. Since the end of Reconstruction, this only happened one time before the election of 2000.
When discussions of how the electoral college is flawed comes up, the defenders of the status quo like to spout about how the current system is what was designed by the Framers to avoid the big states having too much power. The problem is that argument is wrong in three basic ways. First, the original concept behind the electoral college and the belief about how elections would operate ended up being wrong. Which is why the Framers had to amend the Constitution after 1800 to fix the electoral college. Second, there were multiple other reasons for having an electoral college and for the final structure of the electoral college beyond helping the small states counteract the big states. Third, most of those reasons are no longer valid which leaves the question about why should what was ultimately a compromise rather than the core reason for the electoral college still justify keeping what for most of its history has been like the tonsils, wisdom teeth, or appendix of our electoral system.
Let’s turn back to how things were in 1787 when the Constitutional Convention met. There was no television, no radio, no internet, no telephones, no telegraph, no railroad, no cars, no planes. The continent had been organized at the colony level with little or no connections between the colonies before the First Continental Congress. After the Declaration of Independence, the colonies became states, but states were still the basic organizing unit of government. Newspapers were more like your small town local paper is today with nothing like USA Today, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, or the Washington Post. The primary form of transportation was horseback, and it could take several days to travel across a state. It could take weeks for a letter to get from New York to Charleston. In short, politics were local and or state-based. There was no national politics, and it was difficult for the average voter to get information about what was happening in other states.
Posted in Electoral College
Leave a comment
Election Security
Depending on the results over the next seventy-two hours, sore loser Donald Trump and his supporters will probably complain about problems with the machines that count the vote and other election security issues. While every state is different in the exact means that they use to secure the election, most have roughly similar processes that pretty much guarantee that what Trump will be saying is pure fiction (which has never stopped him in the past and will not stop him this year).
One thing that you may hear is the vote counting machines can be hacked. This claim is a half-truth. The machines are computers, and, in theory, any computer can be hacked. The people who raise this claim may even note that the internal security in the programming of the machines is weak. They may be right about that, but that argument misses that the external security is very strong, and there are checks in the process to detect if a machine has been compromised. The biggest external security is that the actual counting machines are not connected to the internet — either by cord or by wireless. The results are manually uploaded from the precinct machines to the county’s machine and the results are then distributed. Hacking these machines requires having physical access to the machine (which only a limited number of people do) or the virus has to be installed at the company that does the programming for the machine.
Even if you could get to the machine, setting up the software to manipulate the results is not easy because it has to defeat the checks. The basic checks are: 1) a pre-election “logic” or “accuracy” test on every machine; 2) a post-election “logic” or “accuracy” test on every machine; 3) a hand count audit on random races from random precincts; and 4) the voter logs from the election. The logic or accuracy test is using a test deck featuring a known number of votes for each candidate including various different weird ways that people can vote (overvotes, skipping races, voting a straight party ticket by marking the bubble for the party, voting a straight party ticket and then marking the bubble for that party in each race, voting a split ballot by marking the party box and then voting for the other party in individual races, etc.). The test is whether the machine gives the known result. If it doesn’t there is something wrong with the programming. And here is where the difficulty for the hack comes in. The person doing the hack does not know when the tests will be done. If the hack takes effect immediately, the machine will fail. The hack has to take effect after the first test and then revert back before the second test — a much more complex hack. Even if that effort succeeds, the hack has to be on only the machines that are not used in the audit. If the hack is on the machines used in the audit, the error will be caught, and the audit will expand to other precincts. And lastly, the hack has to merely switch votes. The voting logs will detect if a precinct has too many votes recorded. In short, it is almost impossible in practice to successfully hack the counting process.
Posted in Elections
Tagged Election Security, logic tests, post-election audits, voting machines
Leave a comment
Election Night Preview — Part Six (Post-Midnight Eastern)
Prior to Midnight, the polls will have closed in forty-eight states and the District of Columbia. All that is left to close are Hawaii and Alaska. Hawaii closes at midnight Eastern (7;00 p.m. local). Polls close at 8:00 p.m. local time in Alaska. For most of the state, that is midnight Eastern. But the Aleutian Islands are in a separate time zone and will close at 1:00 a.m. Eastern.
In Hawaii, the first big chunk of returns will be the early votes, but those are not reported until all polling places have actually closed. As such, it may be an hour or more before results are released. The release of results will be a little bit slower than Alaska.
The biggest race out of these two states is the congressional seat for Alaska, currently held by Democrat Mary Peltola. One factor that will delay a projection in this race is that Alaska uses ranked-choice voting. The Republicans in Alaska have pretty well demonstrated that they do not know how to run a race with ranked choice voting. Thus, rather than running two strong candidates and having the candidates encourage their supporters to rank the other candidate second, the Republicans have had their second candidate withdraw. Not having two candidates attacking Representative Peltola is a strategic mistake. But because the Republicans have cleared the field, it is unlikely that there will be many votes for the remaining candidates on the ballot. A good rule of thumb for ranked choice voting is that a candidate who finishes in second on first preferences is unlikely to have a net gain more than 1% for every 2% of the vote that went to the eliminated candidates. Representative Peltola received a majority of the vote in the primary, but that is now guarantee that she will get a majority of the first preference votes in the general election. It is entirely possible that we will not know the winner until after all counts are voted and preferences are applied, but the history of ranked choice voting in Australia is that, in most races, there is a clear winner with a sufficiently large margin in first preferences that the second-placed candidate can’t realistically catch-up.
Posted in Elections, General Election Forecast, House of Representatives, Senate
Tagged Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Donald Trump, Ed Case, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Jill Tokuda, Kamala Harris, Mary Peltoal, Mazie Hirono, Michigan, Minimum wage, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Ranked Choice Voting, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin
Leave a comment
Election Night Preview — Part Five — The Local News and the West Coast (11:00 To 11:59 P.M. Eastern)
Typically, in the Eastern and Central Time Zones, 11:00 p.m. EDT is when the local affiliates of the “big three” broadcast networks have their local newscasts. Election night is a little bit different. Most of the networks give their affiliate a five minute or so slot at the top and/or bottom of the hour to give an update on the local races. At 11:00 p.m., after doing a quick run down along with any quick projections that can be made, the networks will give an extended break for a short (fifteen minute or so local newscast).
During this hour, we have three states in which the remaining polls close and two states in which the polls close entirely. But, in talking about the West Coast states, there is a heavy reliance on mail-in vote. So vote counting in these states takes days. The partial closings are 8:00 p.m. local (Pacific) time in the majority of Oregon and the northwest part of Idaho and 9:00 p.m. local (Mountain) time in North Dakota. North Dakota and Idaho are covered in yesterday’s post, but Oregon is covered below. The two full closings are in California and Washington.
The result in the presidential race is not in doubt in any of the three states closing this hour. Kamala Harris should sweep all three states. Given how many electoral votes are available in California, it is almost impossible for Vice-President Harris to be projected as the national winner before 11:00 p.m. Similarly, if Adam Schiff is not the new Senator from California and Senator Maria Cantwell is not reelected in Washington, we are looking at a red wave that could get Republicans a filibuster proof majority. In other words, these five contests should be projected for Democrats during the hour. The races to follow in these states are the House races.
Election Night Preview — Part Four — Prime Time Hour Three (10:00 to 10:59 P.M. Eastern)
After the heavy numbers of the previous two hours of prime time, the final hour of prime time represents a slight slowing of polls closing. Of course, that will be made up for as several of the close states will either be projected or turn into all night counts.
There are three partial closings and three full closings this hour. On the partial closing, we have the second of two 9:00 p.m. local time closings with the eastern (Central Time Zone) part of North Dakota. You also have all but the panhandle of Idaho closing at 8:00 p.m. local time (Mountain Time Zone). For both of these states, the part closing represents the majority of the state. The last partial closing is the one exception to the general trend. Oregon is the one start in which the majority of the state is in the western part of the state. So this post will only cover the partial closing in Idaho and North Dakota with Oregon in the next post. The three full closings are Montana and Utah at 8:00 p.m. local time and Nevada at 7:00 p.m. local time.
Idaho, like Wyoming in the previous post, is solidly red. If Democrats are competitive at either the presidential level or for either of the congressional seats, then it will have been a very good night for Democrats. The one contest of interest is a ballot proposition seeking to go to a top four primary with ranked choice voting. While Idaho is not likely to turn blue anytime soon, a top four primary with ranked choice voting might mean more moderate Republicans representing Idaho in the future.
Posted in Elections, General Election Forecast
Tagged Donald Trump, Idaho, Jacky Rosen, Jon Tester, Kamala Harris, Mitt Romney, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Utah
Leave a comment