-
Recent Posts
- Remaining Races and Recounts
- Election Recap
- Electoral College Anachronism
- Election Security
- Election Night Preview — Part Six (Post-Midnight Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Five — The Local News and the West Coast (11:00 To 11:59 P.M. Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Four — Prime Time Hour Three (10:00 to 10:59 P.M. Eastern)
Search
Welcome to DCW
Upcoming Events
7/15/24 - GOP Convention
TBD - Democratic Convention
11/5/24 - Election DayTools
Archives
Tag Cloud
2008 Democratic National Convention 2012 Democratic National Convention 2012 Republican National Convention 2016 Democratic National Convention 2016 Republican National Convention 2020 Census 2020 Democratic Convention 2024 Democratic Convention 2024 Republican Convention Abortion Affordable Care Act Alabama Arizona Bernie Sanders California Colorado Donald Trump First Amendment Florida Free Exercise Clause Free Speech Georgia Hillary Clinton Immigration Iowa Joe Biden Kansas Maine Marco Rubio Michigan Missouri Nevada New Hampshire North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania redistricting South Carolina Supreme Court Ted Cruz Texas United Kingdom Virginia Voting Rights Act WisconsinDCW in the News
Blog Roll
Site Info
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- tmess2 on Election Recap
- Anthony Uplandpoet Watkins on Election Recap
- Anthony Uplandpoet Watkins on Election Recap
- DocJess on Don’t think we’re getting a contested convention
- Matt on Dems to nominate Biden early to avoid GOP Ohio nonsense
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- August 2012
- November 2011
- August 2011
- January 2011
- May 2010
- January 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Categories
- 2019-nCoV
- 2020 Convention
- 2020 General Election
- 2020DNC
- 2024 Convention
- 2028 Convention
- Anti-Semitism
- Bernie Sanders
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Civil Rights
- Cleveland
- Climate Change
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Tips
- COVID-19
- Debates
- Delegate Count
- Delegates
- Democratic Debates
- Democratic Party
- Democrats
- DemsinPhilly
- DemsInPHL
- Disaster
- DNC
- Donald Trump
- Economy
- Elections
- Electoral College
- Federal Budget
- Freedom of the Press
- General Election Forecast
- GOP
- Healthcare
- Hillary Clinton
- Holidays
- Hotels
- House of Representatives
- Houston
- Identity Politics
- Impeachment
- Iowa Caucuses
- Jacksonville
- Joe Biden
- Judicial
- LGBT
- Mariner Pipeline
- Merrick Garland
- Meta
- Milwaukee
- Money in Politics
- Music
- National Security
- Netroots Nation
- New Yor
- New York
- NH Primary
- Notes from Your Doctor
- NoWallNoBan
- Pandemic
- Philadelphia
- PHLDNC2016
- Platform
- Politics
- Polls
- Presidential Candidates
- Primary and Caucus Results
- Primary Elections
- Public Health
- Rant
- Republican Debates
- Republicans
- Resist
- RNC
- Russia
- Senate
- Snark
- Student Loan Debt
- Sunday with the Senators
- Superdelegates
- Syria
- The Politics of Hate
- Uncategorized
- Vaccines
- War
- Weekly White House Address
Meta
Tag Archives: Angela Merkel
A Long December
As we come to the end of another year, there are a lot of things happening.
Let’s start with North Carolina and the Ninth District, the last of the House seats still up in the air. It is unclear how much of the vote count has been impacted by the shenanigans. There is substantial evidence showing that political operatives broke North Carolina law by getting involved in the collection of absentee ballots from non-relatives. There is also evidence suggesting that these individuals may suggests that these operaves were selective in turning in the ballots that they received and may have altered other ballots (e.g., by casting votes in races that the voter left blank). Since some states do allow non-relatives to collect absentee ballots, what is happening in North Carolina shows the need to have some anti-fraud measures in such voting. Making it easy to vote is a good thing. However, historically, we have known that most voter fraud is connected with mail-in or absentee voting and not with in-person voter-impersonation. Of course, Republicans have been more concerned with stopping in-person fraud in ways that make it difficult to vote in person. Meanwhile, they have uniformly been willing to relax the rules designed to assure that ballots received in the mail actually reflect the intent of the person who supposedly have cast them. Going forward, Democrats — wanting to make it easy for people to vote — need to be sure that the rules include adequate protection to prevent con-artists from stealing and altering ballots before they get to the election office.
We have also seen the start of Democrats announcing that they are considering running for President. Over the next three to six months, we will see more Democrats announce their campaigns; some of these candidates will decide to halt their campaigns before we reach July, but many of them will make the late Summer when we begin to have debates. While the DNC does not need to finalize its debate plans yet, it does need to consider what the Republicans did wrong in 2016 (as well as what the Democrats did wrong in 2016). The Republicans big problem was having too many candidates for a single debate. The simple reality is that more candidates on the stage translates into less substance and more personal attacks and everyone agreeing with what they perceive as party orthodoxy. On the other hand, there is no rational method for choosing which candidates make the debate. The Republican tentative solution was what many called the JV or kiddie-table debate in which polls were used to separate the top candidates from the others. However, after the first four or five candidates, the gap between the remaining candidates will often be less than the standard margin of error in most polls. (In other words, the difference is close enough that the real standing of the candidates is unclear.) Offering my humble suggestions, the following makes sense to me: 1) No more than six or seven candidates on the stage at a time (even that is probably too many, but it allows each candidate to have a semi-substantive response to each question); 2) all parts of the debate need to be in prime time (see next suggestion below) even if that means short breaks between the parts in which candidates are rushed on and off the stage with no opportunity to schmooze with the audience for those in the earlier parts; and 3) the candidates in part one or part two (or part three if there are even more candidates) should be randomly suggested and there should be a limit on the number of consecutive times that a candidate can be in any part (in other words, no part is clearly the “Not Ready for Prime Time” debate and no candidate is consistently going in the early debate or the late debate).
Posted in Democratic Party, Elections, House of Representatives, Politics
Also tagged 2019 Canadian Election, 2020 Pesidential Primary, 2020 Presidetial Debate, Brexit, Donald Trump, Health Care, Justin Trudeau, North Carolina, Theresa May
Comments Off on A Long December
German Elections 2017
In a little over two weeks (September 24), Germany will hold parliamentary elections. As with most parliamentary system, the leader of Germany is determined by which party (or coalition of parties) wins the majority of seats in parliament. As such, the results on September 24 will determine if Angela Merkel continues as Chancellor of Germany for another four years.
In electing members of its parliament (the Bundestag),Germany uses a variation on the mixed member system. The basics of this system is that voters cast two ballots. In one, they vote for the person who will represent their constituency in parliament. On the second, they vote for the party. Each lander (think state) has a certain number of constituencies. On the high end is North Rhine-Westphalia (Bonn, Cologne, Dusseldorf) with sixty-four constituencies. On the low end is Bremen with two constituencies. In total, there are two hundred ninety-nine constituencies.
In theory, each lander has a number of “party list” seats equal to the number of constituencies in the lander (which would translate to a parliament of 598 seats), but there is a catch. In calculating, the number of party list seats that each party wins in each lander, the formula uses the whole number of seats in the lander (constituency plus party list seats and allocates them using proportional representation (i.e. if a party won 10% of the vote, they are entitled to 10% of the seats) based on the vote for each party in that lander. After calculating the number of seats that each party should receive from the lander, the formula then subtracts the number of constituency seats that each party has won. If that leaves any party with a negative number (i.e. the party won more constituency seats than the number of seats that they would have won under proportional representation), the party gets to keep the extra seats (commonly called overhang seats), the other parties receive “compensation” seats to make the results proportional, and the lander ends up with additional seats in parliament. )
There are two mechanisms for qualifying for party list seats — win 5% of the vote nationally or win three constituency seats. In the last election, the Christian Democrats (including their Bavarian counterpart), the Social Democrats, and the Left were the only parties to win three or more constituency seats. (Since unification, these are the only three groups to win three or more constituency seats in any election.) Other parties have, in the past reached the five percent national threshold to win party list seats. For the party list seats, while the lander results are used to allocate the seats, it is the national result that determines if a party is eligible for seats. In other words, if a party got 8% nationally, they will still get seats from a lander in which they only received 4% of the vote. On the other hand, a party that only got 4% of the vote nationally will not win any party list seats in a lander even if they got 7% of the vote in that lander.
Based on the polls and the results in 2013, there are six parties that have a reasonable chance at winning seats this election. The party group that is likely to win the most seats are the Christian Democrats of current Chancellor Angela Merkel. (The Christian Democrats run in fifteen of the sixteen lander. They do not run in Bavaria where their sister party, the Christian Social Union runs.) The CDU is traditionally a center-right party (think of them as a little to the left of a moderate Republican). In the last election, the CDU won 311 (out of 631) seats on 41% of the vote nationally.
Second place is likely to go to the Social Democrats, a center-left party (think of them as a little to the left of Bernie Sanders). In the last election, the Social Democrats won 193 seats on 26% of the vote. There was a time earlier this year when the Social Democrats (with a new leader) were running neck and neck with the CDU. The most recent polls, however, put the CDU in the upper 30s and the SDP in the lower 20s (in other words roughly the same place as 2013 with a slightly larger share going to the minor parties).
In the last election, third place went to the Left. The roots of the Left are in the old Communist Party of East Germany and its base tends to be in that part of the country where it runs even with or ahead of the SDP (in several lander in what used to be West Germany, the Left struggles to get 5%). In the last election, the Left won 64 seats (including four constituencies in East Berlin) on 8% of the vote.
Of the remaining three parties, only the Greens won seats in the last election (63 seats on 8% of the vote). Like in the U.S., the Greens are an environmental/ultra-progressive party in Europe. The other two parties — the Free Democrats and Alternative for Germany fell just short of 5% in 2013. The Free Democrats used to be the centrist party in Germany holding the balance of power between the CDU and SDP. However, they have become more conservative/quasi-libertarian. The Alternative for Germany is an ultra-nationalist (think Donald Trump) party. (Alternative for Germany started about five years ago as a Euro-sceptic party but has become so far right that some of its founders who were centrists have abandoned the party.)
For the four smaller parties, polling has changed dramatically over this year. Just before Trump was elected, the Alternative for Germany looked like it might finish in third place with something in the mid-teens. Since then the number has dropped. Depending upon which poll you credit, all four are looking at receiving something between 7 and 11% of the vote which would mean that they would all win some seats.
If the poll results hold up, several things are likely to be true. First, as in the recent elections, the CDU will probably win a very large majority of the constituency seats. (In 2013, the CDU/CSU won 236 of the 299 constituency seats.) Such a one-sided result will also mean that the CDU/CSU will pick up a large number of overhang seats. Second, there will be a much tinier percent of the vote going to no-qualifying parties. (In the last election over 13% went to non-qualifying party as both the FDP and Alternative barely missed qualify; if they had both qualified, the non-qualifying vote would have been around 4% which is what seems to be likely this election.) That means that the same percentage of the vote as last time will translate into fewer party list seats for each of the four parties that won seats in 2013.
The German election system tends to produce coalition governments (but, since the founders of West Germany wanted to avoid repeating the disaster of the Weimar Republic, there are several rules in place to enhance the stability of such coalitions and avoid early elections.) In the perfect world, the CDU would prefer to form a coalition with the FDP and the SDP would prefer to form a coalition with the Greens. At least for now, neither the CDU nor the SDP see the Left or Alternative as suitable coalition partners. Given the recent weakness of the FDP and the strength of the Left, two of the last three elections (including the 2013 elections) have resulted in a “grand” coalition of the CDU and SPD. Based on where polling currently stands, while the FDP is almost certain to return to parliament, it looks more likely than not that the CDU/CSU and FDP will not win enough combined seats to have a majority. While it is theoretically possible that the CDU/CSU could reach out to the Alternative or the Greens, both are unlikely. As such, the most likely result is another coalition government between the CDU and SDP.
In short, it looks likely that the status quo will prevail in Germany. Given the hostility between Chancellor Merkel and President Trump, the solid win for Chancellor Merkel has to be seen as another rebuke to Trumpism by a major European democracy. (Particularly as Trump’s preferred party has fallen so significantly over the past twelve months.) For the U.S., this means that we can expect Germany to continue to assert itself as the natural leader of Europe — particular with the U.S. being effectively AWOL from European issues under President Trump. The tough question for the U.S. will be whether — under a new President in 2021 who believes that the U.S. should play a leading role in forming the international consensus on the major global issues — we will be able to reclaim our leadership from Germany.
Posted in Elections
Also tagged Donald Trump, Germay, mixed member system, proportional representation, Trumpism
1 Comment