-
Recent Posts
- Election Night Preview — Part Six (Post-Midnight Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Five — The Local News and the West Coast (11:00 To 11:59 P.M. Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Four — Prime Time Hour Three (10:00 to 10:59 P.M. Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Three — Prime Time Hour Two (9:00 To 9:59 P.M. Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Two — Prime Time Hour One (8:00 to 8:59 p.m. Eastern)
- Exit Polls and Projections
- Election Night Preview — Part I — Pre-Prime Time
Search
Welcome to DCW
Upcoming Events
7/15/24 - GOP Convention
TBD - Democratic Convention
11/5/24 - Election DayTools
Archives
Tag Cloud
2008 Democratic National Convention 2012 Democratic National Convention 2012 Republican National Convention 2016 Democratic National Convention 2016 Republican National Convention 2020 Census 2020 Democratic Convention 2024 Democratic Convention 2024 Republican Convention Abortion Affordable Care Act Alabama Arizona Bernie Sanders California Colorado Donald Trump First Amendment Florida Free Exercise Clause Free Speech Georgia Hillary Clinton Immigration Iowa Joe Biden Kansas Maine Marco Rubio Michigan Missouri Nevada New Hampshire North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania redistricting South Carolina Supreme Court Ted Cruz Texas United Kingdom Virginia Voting Rights Act WisconsinDCW in the News
Blog Roll
Site Info
-
Recent Posts
- Election Night Preview — Part Six (Post-Midnight Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Five — The Local News and the West Coast (11:00 To 11:59 P.M. Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Four — Prime Time Hour Three (10:00 to 10:59 P.M. Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Three — Prime Time Hour Two (9:00 To 9:59 P.M. Eastern)
- Election Night Preview — Part Two — Prime Time Hour One (8:00 to 8:59 p.m. Eastern)
Recent Comments
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- August 2012
- November 2011
- August 2011
- January 2011
- May 2010
- January 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Categories
- 2019-nCoV
- 2020 Convention
- 2020 General Election
- 2020DNC
- 2024 Convention
- 2028 Convention
- Anti-Semitism
- Bernie Sanders
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Civil Rights
- Cleveland
- Climate Change
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Tips
- COVID-19
- Debates
- Delegate Count
- Delegates
- Democratic Debates
- Democratic Party
- Democrats
- DemsinPhilly
- DemsInPHL
- Disaster
- DNC
- Donald Trump
- Economy
- Elections
- Electoral College
- Federal Budget
- Freedom of the Press
- General Election Forecast
- GOP
- Healthcare
- Hillary Clinton
- Holidays
- Hotels
- House of Representatives
- Houston
- Identity Politics
- Impeachment
- Iowa Caucuses
- Jacksonville
- Joe Biden
- Judicial
- LGBT
- Mariner Pipeline
- Merrick Garland
- Meta
- Milwaukee
- Money in Politics
- Music
- National Security
- Netroots Nation
- New Yor
- New York
- NH Primary
- Notes from Your Doctor
- NoWallNoBan
- Pandemic
- Philadelphia
- PHLDNC2016
- Platform
- Politics
- Polls
- Presidential Candidates
- Primary and Caucus Results
- Primary Elections
- Public Health
- Rant
- Republican Debates
- Republicans
- Resist
- RNC
- Russia
- Senate
- Snark
- Student Loan Debt
- Sunday with the Senators
- Superdelegates
- Syria
- The Politics of Hate
- Uncategorized
- Vaccines
- War
- Weekly White House Address
Meta
Tag Archives: Iowa Caucuses
Technology and the Caucus States
By now, everyone has heard of the problems with the app that the Iowa Democratic Party purchased to aid in getting the caucus results.
First, I don’t believe that there was anything sinister with the provider of the app. Yes, the company that makes the app has connections to people working for several of the campaigns and the Obama Administration. But the world of political consultants is rather small. Political parties need data bases to track voters and contacts in the various precincts and counties; so they tend to have relationship with certain software providers who have divided that type of information. And political campaigns need that same type of data; so they are likely to have connections to the same consultants. Some of the features needed for keeping an up-to-date list of voters and tracking the likely Democrats in each precinct (and updating based on canvasses) would seem to be comparable to what is needed to run caucuses and get results. In any case, the process includes a paper “back-up” that has to be verified by the local representatives of each campaign. So, while mistakes were made, to support a conspiracy theory, you would need to imply a lot of plants in all of the campaigns in the right locations.
Second, what does seem to have happened as a common tech problem. As a government attorney, I have seen multiple generations of case management systems. While the programming is beyond me, successful new systems have several things in common. After getting the basic parameters, the programmers design a program to meet the requirements. A bunch of internal alpha testers then sit down and try to use the system. Their comments on what works and what doesn’t work then lead to revisions designed to fix any bugs in the software and make the system more user friendly. Then you recruit beta testers from the pool of people who will have to use the system once it goes live. Again, updates are made based on the comments from the beta testers. Then the system is rolled out gradually starting with some pilot counties or pilot units within the office. This gradual rollout allows training of small groups of users and a chance to fix the system when the real world experience doesn’t match the testing. It may take eight or nine months (or even longer for something going to every county in a large state) before the system is running in every county and every office. While there are certainly target dates, there are no absolute deadline. So if things go poorly in the pilot counties, you can take the time to fix the problem. (For example, when my state went to an electronic filing system for court pleadings, it took three to four years to get to 100+ counties. And this gradual process allowed the trainers to spend two to three months with court staff in each county and to offer multiple training opportunities to attorneys. Since my practice at the time involved multiple counties, by the middle of the process, I was used to using the system in half of my counties and couldn’t wait for the rest of the counties to get the system.)
Posted in Primary Elections
Also tagged Nevada Caucuses, technology
Comments Off on Technology and the Caucus States
Who Wins Iowa?
No, this post is not about which candidate I believe will actually win Iowa. Rather, it is about how the networks will report the result in Iowa this evening.
As discussed in last week’s post on delegate math, the delegate selection plan for Iowa has the Iowa Democratic Party reporting three separate counts from tonight’s caucuses. And it will be interesting to see how the media treats these numbers in assessing the results.
The first count is the initial preference votes from the precinct caucuses. This vote is the vote that most accurately reflects the support that each candidate has and is the closest thing to the votes in other states (excluding those with ranked-choice voting). In years past, this number has not been available to the media. There are strong arguments for using this number in determining who “won” Iowa.
Posted in Iowa Caucuses, Primary and Caucus Results
Also tagged Media, Vote Counts
Comments Off on Who Wins Iowa?
Iowa Caucus 2020 Rules — First Look
Part of the changes in the DNC Call for the 2020 Convention and National Delegate Selection Rules were provisions governing the caucus states. In past cycles, the results in states which used caucuses as their delegate selection process but also used a later non-binding primary showed two things. First, significantly more people participated in the non-binding primary. Second, the voters in the non-binding primary had different preferences than those who attended the caucuses. Additionally, the rules in some of the caucus states created an opportunity for “mischief” at the later levels of the delegate selection process permitting a well-organized campaign to win additional delegates at those later levels and costing a poorly-organized campaigns delegates that they had apparently won on caucus nights. The new rules attempted to address these “problems” In particular, Rule 2.K of the Delegate Selection Rules includes requirements that caucus state have a procedure for early or absentee votes in the caucus, have a mechanism to allow participation by those who are unable to attend their local caucus at the time and location set for the local caucus, a means for reporting the “statewide and district level results for each candidate based on the first expression of preference by the participants” in the first level of caucuses; and require that “the allocation of all national delegates, be locked in at the final expression of preference” in the first level of caucuses. However, Rule 14.B and Rule 14.E seem to suggest that caucus states might still be able a later level as the determining step. (In primary states, these same rules require using the primary vote.)
In 2016, the Iowa Caucus (held under the old rules) did have a process by which voters could vote absentee via satellite and tele-caucuses but the satellite caucuses only elected three state convention delegates and the tele-caucuses only selected two state convention delegates. Voters participating in either of these alternative caucuses had no role in the selecting delegates at the district level. For those who could attend the precinct caucuses, at the precinct caucus, attendees would divide into an initial preference and determine which groups were viable (with a general 15% threshold unless the precinct was electing three or fewer delegates to the county convention). After the initial count, attendees would have the opportunity (based on which preferences were viable or close to viable) to change their preference. The precinct chair would report the results of this second count to the state party in terms of “state delegate equivalents” and would not result raw votes. The delegates selected at the precinct caucuses would attend the county conventions where a similar process would occur to select the delegates who would be attending the congressional district convention and the state convention. A similar process would again occur at the congressional district conventions and the state convention to determine the allocation of the national convention delegates selected at those conventions. For multiple reasons (the possibility of delegates elected at precinct caucuses and county conventions not attending later conventions, the possibility of changes in preference of such delegates, delegates pledged to withdrawn candidates choosing between the remaining candidates, and the fact that each delegate chosen at a precinct meeting was a fraction of a state delegate and those fractions would be converted to whole numbers at the county convention), the report of the state delegate equivalent only provided a rough estimate of the national delegates that each candidate was likely to receive from Iowa.
We now have a draft of the 2020 Delegate Selection Rules for Iowa. (Of course, these rules still have to go through a public comment period, be finally approved by the Iowa Democratic Party, and by approved by the Rules and By-laws Committee of the Democratic National Committee before becoming final.) This draft gives us a first look at how the caucus states might change their state rules to comply with the new national rules.
Posted in 2020 Convention, Delegates, Democratic Party, Elections
Also tagged 2020 Delegate Selection Plans
Comments Off on Iowa Caucus 2020 Rules — First Look
Iowa Math
While vote totals are not irrelevant to presidential elections (especially in the primary phase when trailing candidates quickly find that they lack the financial resources to continue), what ultimately matters is not the popular vote, but winning delegates (for the primaries) and electors (for the general). The delegate math heading into the Iowa Caucuses are different for the two parties for two reasons: 1) the stage at which delegates are bound and 2) the two parties do proportional representation differently.
Posted in DNC, Elections, GOP, Politics, RNC
Also tagged Ben Carson, Bernie Sanders, Delegate Selection, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Marco Rubio, Martin O'Malley, Ted Cruz
Comments Off on Iowa Math
Iowa Caucuses: Delegate Counts
Yesterday, I posted about my personal experience at an Iowa caucus. Today, a discussion of what will happen this year at the caucuses, and the impact of different scenarios going forward.
Democratic Caucuses
I’d love to do one of those columns like the arts folks do for the awards shows, as in “will win/should win/honourable mention” – but this is DCW and we don’t take sides on contested Democratic primaries. So we’ll stick to just the facts as we know them today, 18 days out.
Iowa has 52 delegates to the Convention. The eight Superdelegates are: seven Iowa DNC members and David Loebsack, the sole member of the Iowa Congressional delegation. The remaining 44 will be chosen through the process, which involves A LOT of math. The full set of computations can be found here.
Basically, to be viable on 1 February, a candidate needs 15% of the vote to be considered. After the first count, that will be Bernie and Hillary. Since the polls are so close, the real question is the Martin O’Malley voters, and the small number of undecideds. Interestingly, while the media will pounce on who won, there’s a chance that the delegates chosen will not actually end up being delegates, and even if they do go to the convention, they might not align with the person he/she represented on 1 February. Yes really.
Posted in Elections
Comments Off on Iowa Caucuses: Delegate Counts
Iowa Caucuses: A Personal Tale
We all talk about the caucuses – who will attend, which party the caucus-goers will choose, who will win what percentage of the vote. But you don’t often hear about what it’s really like to attend one.
I attended a caucus in Iowa in the 1980’s. Being from New York and having worked campaigns, petition drives, and for the party, I had this arrogant view that the caucuses would be “quaint”. I couldn’t have been more wrong.
Pre-caucus thought: gentle people having somewhat informed conversations over tea and cookies.
Reality: these people are serious, informed, and support their candidates with a passion it’s hard to find elsewhere.
Posted in Uncategorized
2 Comments