-
Recent Posts
Search
Welcome to DCW
Upcoming Events
7/15/24 - GOP Convention
TBD - Democratic Convention
11/5/24 - Election DayTools
Archives
Tag Cloud
2008 Democratic National Convention 2012 Democratic National Convention 2012 Republican National Convention 2016 Democratic National Convention 2016 Republican National Convention 2020 Census 2020 Democratic Convention 2024 Democratic Convention 2024 Republican Convention Abortion Affordable Care Act Alabama Arizona Bernie Sanders California Colorado Donald Trump First Amendment Florida Free Exercise Clause Free Speech Georgia Hillary Clinton Immigration Iowa Joe Biden Kansas Maine Marco Rubio Michigan Missouri Nevada New Hampshire North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania redistricting South Carolina Supreme Court Ted Cruz Texas United Kingdom Virginia Voting Rights Act WisconsinDCW in the News
Blog Roll
Site Info
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- tmess2 on Election Recap
- Anthony Uplandpoet Watkins on Election Recap
- Anthony Uplandpoet Watkins on Election Recap
- DocJess on Don’t think we’re getting a contested convention
- Matt on Dems to nominate Biden early to avoid GOP Ohio nonsense
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- August 2012
- November 2011
- August 2011
- January 2011
- May 2010
- January 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Categories
- 2019-nCoV
- 2020 Convention
- 2020 General Election
- 2020DNC
- 2024 Convention
- 2028 Convention
- Anti-Semitism
- Bernie Sanders
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Civil Rights
- Cleveland
- Climate Change
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Tips
- COVID-19
- Debates
- Delegate Count
- Delegates
- Democratic Debates
- Democratic Party
- Democrats
- DemsinPhilly
- DemsInPHL
- Disaster
- DNC
- Donald Trump
- Economy
- Elections
- Electoral College
- Federal Budget
- Freedom of the Press
- General Election Forecast
- GOP
- Healthcare
- Hillary Clinton
- Holidays
- Hotels
- House of Representatives
- Houston
- Identity Politics
- Impeachment
- Iowa Caucuses
- Jacksonville
- Joe Biden
- Judicial
- LGBT
- Mariner Pipeline
- Merrick Garland
- Meta
- Milwaukee
- Money in Politics
- Music
- National Security
- Netroots Nation
- New Yor
- New York
- NH Primary
- Notes from Your Doctor
- NoWallNoBan
- Pandemic
- Philadelphia
- PHLDNC2016
- Platform
- Politics
- Polls
- Presidential Candidates
- Primary and Caucus Results
- Primary Elections
- Public Health
- Rant
- Republican Debates
- Republicans
- Resist
- RNC
- Russia
- Senate
- Snark
- Student Loan Debt
- Sunday with the Senators
- Superdelegates
- Syria
- The Politics of Hate
- Uncategorized
- Vaccines
- War
- Weekly White House Address
Meta
Tag Archives: Missouri
Election Night Preview — Part Two — Prime Time Hour One (8:00 to 8:59 p.m. Eastern)
While there are some significant states that close before 8:00 p.m. Eastern, that time marks when election coverage truly kicks off. Aside from the realities of the broadcast networks that as for two basic reasons. First, as discussed last weekend, vote counting is slow. Since people in line when the polls “close” can still vote, it takes some time to actually shut down a polling place (both in getting the last people processed and out and in the procedures to secure the election materials after the polling place closes). And then the counting usually have to be transported to some central location for the local election authority. Thus, the first hour of returns tend to be the results of early voting and absentee ballots (in those states which release those separately from the election day returns) and a handful of smaller counties. It is only in the second and third hour of counting that you start getting the rest of the smaller counties and the first returns from the really big counties. Second, not every state closes at 7:00 p.m., local time, and a good chunk of the states are not in the Eastern time zone. Only two states (Indiana and Kentucky) close at 6:00 p.m. local time. While 7:00 p.m. is one of the more popular local times to close, only nineteen states close then (and only five of those are in the Eastern time zone). Four states (Arkansas, North Carolina, Ohio, and West Virginia) close at 7:30 p.m. local time. The most popular poll closing time is actually 8:00 p.m. when twenty-two jurisdictions close their polls. You have two states (Tennessee and Nebraska) which despite being split in two time zones have opted to have all the polls close at the same real time (meaning in the eastern part of the state, the polls close at 8:00 p.m. local time while in the western part of the state, the polls close at 7:00 p.m. local time). Lastly, two states (New York and North Dakota) close at 9:00 p.m. local time.
So when 8:00 p.m. Eastern time rolls around, you have polls closing in the ten jurisdictions wholly in the Eastern time zone that close at 8:00 local time. You also have the polls in the western part of Florda closing at what is 7:00 p.m. local time in that part of Florida to finish out Florida. You have the polls closing at 8:00 p.m. local time in the part of Michigan in the Eastern time zone (all but the Western part of the Upper Peninsula), You have the polls closing simultaneously at either 8:00 p.m. local time or 7:00 p.m. local time in Tennessee. You have all of the polls closing at 7:00 p.m. local time in Alabama, Illinois, Mississippi, Missouri, and Oklahoma. And you have polls closing at 7:00 p.m. local time in the eastern parts of Kansas, South Dakota, and Texas. Of those last three states, only South Dakota is roughly evenly divided geographically between Central and Mountain time and only tiny slivers of Kansas and Texas are in the Mountain time zone. In short, you go from approximately ten jurisdictions being closed, to the majority of almost thirty jurisdictions being closed. For all intents and purposes, election night starts at 8:00 p.m. Eastern.
As the hour starts, we should have already had some expected projections from the early states. And the early news is more likely to be bad news than good news, but it is expected bad news that should not cause people to panic. Barring a miracle, by 8:00 p.m. Eastern, the networks and the AP will have projected Donald Trump the winner in Indiana, Kentucky, South Carolina, and West Virginia. They will also have projected the Republicans as winning two Senate seats (Indiana and West Virginia) to one for the Democrats (Vermont) for a gain of one although it is possible that the Virginia Senate seat might also be projected before 8:00 p.m. And most of the early House seats projected will be Republican with a couple of seats gained in North Carolina.
Posted in Elections, General Election Forecast
Also tagged Alabama, Andy Kim, Arkansas, Bob Casey, Brian Fitzpatrick, Chellie Pingree, Chris Sununu, Connecticut, David Trone, Debbie Stabenow, Delaware, District of Columbia, Donald Trump, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Elissa Slotkin, Elizabeth Warren, Eric Sorenson, Henry Cuellar, Hillary Scholten, Illinois, Jahana Hayes, Jared Golden, John Carvey, John James, Josh Hawley, Kamala Harris, Kansas, Kelly Ayotte, Larry Hogan, Lisa Rochester, Maine, Marsha Blackburn, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Sharice Davids, South Dakota, Ted Cruz, Tennessee, Texas, Tom Carper, Tom Keane
Comments Off on Election Night Preview — Part Two — Prime Time Hour One (8:00 to 8:59 p.m. Eastern)
Primary Elections — Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Washington, Hawaii
Another week, another set of primaries. While the national media is focused on who will be the next Vice-President of the United States, the results of these elections will determine what seats might be competitive in November, and, in some cases, the winner is all but certain to be holding office in January. On Tuesday, there will be primaries in Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, and Washington. On Saturday, there will be primaries in Hawaii.
In Kansas, Republican engaged in extreme gerrymandering. The Republicans’ problem in drawing lines is that half of the state’s population is in a handful of counties in Eastern Kansas covering the western suburbs of Kansas City, the state capitol in Topeka, and the University of Kansas in Lawrence. While not deep blue, this area is definitely bluer than the rest of the state. Under the pre-2020 lines, the Second District was a lean Republican district and the Third District was a swing district with a slight edge for the Democrats. To try to “fix” this, the Republicans in Kansas drew some weird lines to make the First District (western Kansas) and the Second District (Topeka and Lawrence) into a weird interlocking jigsaw puzzle which allowed moving some blue areas out of the Third District (K.C. suburbs) into the Second District while adding enough red areas into the Second District to make it redder. The impact was to make the Second District relatively safe while keeping the Third District competitive but slightly favorable to the Republicans.
During the past several cycles, the Second District has been something of a revolving door. The candidate elected in 2018 was scandal plagued and lost the primary in 2020. The candidate who won in 2020 got tired of the shenanigans in Washington after a mere four years and opted against seeking a third term. As a result, there are five candidates seeking the Republican nomination, three of whom are roughly equal in fundraising. The two leading candidates appear to be Jeff Kahrs who serves on the staff of the current representative and appears to have the endorsement of what passes for the Republican establishment in Kansas and former state Attorney General and failed gubernatorial candidate Derek Schmidt who has the support of the Trump wing of the Kansas party.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives, Primary Elections, Senate
Also tagged Bill Eigel, Bob Ferguson, Bob Onder, Carl Malinga, Cori Bush, Dan Newhouse, Dave Reichert, Derek Schmidt, Ellen Slotkin, Hawaii, Hillary Scholten, Jay Ashcroft, Jeff Kahrs, John James, Josh Hawley, Justin Amash, Kansas, Kristen Rivet, Kurt Schaeffer, Lucas Kunce, Maria Cantwell, Michael Baumgartner, Michigan, Mike Kehoe, Mike Rogers, Paul Junge, Presath Reddy, Raul Garcia, Sharice Davids, Washington, Wesley Bell
Comments Off on Primary Elections — Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Washington, Hawaii
Persuasion vs. Coercion
Sometimes, the U.S. Supreme Court will schedule arguments to create a “theme” day. In other words, the Court will schedule two cases which are technically unrelated but involve similar issues. By hearing arguments in the two cases back-to-back, the Justices get two factually different pictures of conduct to point out some of the different ways that the issue might arise and, hopefully, can get some input through both cases on how a particular test for judging whether conduct crossed the line would play out.
This week, we had one of those theme days involving when governmental conduct indirectly infringes on the First Amendment. The first case, Murthy, Surgeon General, vs. Missouri, arises from the efforts of the Surgeon General’s Office to talk with social media companies about posts containing medically harmful information related to COVID. The nutty Attorney Generals from Louisiana and Missouri (which at that time was now Senator Eric Schmitt) filed a lawsuit in front of a handpicked judge in the Western District of Louisiana seeking an injunction barring all communications between federal officials and social media companies. That “judge” granted that request. The Fifth Circuit narrowed the injunction somewhat but left it substantially intact. The other case, National Rifle Association vs. Vullo, involves a state financial services regulator trying to persuade regulated entities (banks and insurance companies) that they should stop doing business with the NRA.
What seems to be clear from the arguments in these two cases is that the Supreme Court is likely to make a distinction between persuasion and coercion. In asking questions, several justices fell back on their own executive branch experience. In traditional media, it is not unusual for reporters to call government officials asking for comments on a potential story. In some cases, the story is one that, for a variety of reasons, the government official might prefer that the story not get published (or at least that certain details not run). Sometimes those reasons are good reasons like in a murder investigation somebody might have leaked a key detail from the crime scene to a reporter which the police were intending to use as a “false confession check” (on the theory that only the killer would know that detail so any nut coming in to take credit for something they did not do would get that detail wrong). But those reasons might not be strong enough for the government to seek a court order preventing publication. So the government will try to convince the news media that it would be best if that information was not included in the story. In making this request, the government might offer a “comp” like an exclusive interview with the police chief on some other topic. It seems like, in the Murthy case, the Supreme Court is likely to slap the lower court and the state AGs hard for what is really a legally meritless argument. There is really nothing here suggesting that these claims involve anything beyond routine attempts to persuade media to go with the official story. And the First Amendment does not prohibit the government from trying to convince publishers to do the right thing.
Posted in Judicial
Also tagged Abuse of Process, Covid, First Amendment, Louisiana, NRA, Social Media, Supreme Court
Comments Off on Persuasion vs. Coercion
Georgia Runoff
The last election of 2022 will conclude on Tuesday with the runoff election for U.S. Senator in Georgia. While there are still some races that will go to recounts, all of the statewide and congressional races seem to be outside the margin at which a recount could make a difference. (There are three races with margins between 500 and 600 votes — Arizona Attorney General, California Thirteenth District, and Colorado Third District. In the Minnestoa Senate recount in 2008, the net swing from the original results to the recount results was 450 votes with an additional 87 votes gained in the election contest. The closest of the three races going to recount is 511. While other recounts have resulted in bigger swings, they were in races with bigger margins and Minnesota remains the largest swing that changed the results of a race.
The significance of the Senate race is not quite as big as it was in 2021 due to the Republicans apparently taking the House (but the Republican’s inability to reach a consensus on the next Speaker will be the subject of a future post) and the fact that the Democrats already have 50 seats. But the result still matters for five key reasons.
First, the additional seat will alter the composition of committees. With a 50-50 Senate, the committees are evenly divided. While the rules currently allow a bill or nomination to proceed to the Senate floor on a tie vote, a 51-49 Senate would result in the Democrats having a majority on the committees.
Posted in Elections, General Election Forecast, Senate
Also tagged Florida, Georgia, Herschel Walker, Joe Manchin, Krysten Sinema, Montana, Ohio, Raphael Warnock, Texas, West Virginia
Comments Off on Georgia Runoff
The Midterms — Preview (Part 2)
The first states with polls to close are mostly in the Eastern Time Zone. In the early states, we have two governor’s races (Georgia and Florida), four Senate races (Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Ohio), and seven House seats (1 in North Carolina, 3 in Ohio, and 3 in Virginia) that could be close. There are also several seats that are likely to flip solely because of the new maps (4 flipping red in Florida, 1 flipping red in Georgia, and 2 flipping blue in North Carolina).
But the big closing time is 7 p.m. Central ST. The remaining polls will close in Florida, and most of the polls will close in Kansas, Michigan, South Dakota, and Texas. And all of the polls will close in Alabama (except for a very small portion that closed an hour earlier), Connecticut, Delaware, D.C., Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Tennessee. In short, when added to the states that close before 7 p.m., the polls will be closed in roughly half of the country by 7:01 p.m. (Of course, polls closed merely means that individuals need to be in line to vote at 7 p.m. Because there are typically people in line to vote, voting might actually continue in some urban precincts for a very long time after 7 p.m. which will delay counting in those areas.)
Starting with Alabama, there are no races that are likely to be close at the state or federal level. If the Supreme Court follows the Voting Rights Act, Democrats will probably pick up an additional seat in 2024, but the current maps which a district court correctly held violated the Voting Rights Act is in place for the 2022 election, and the 6-1 Republican advantage will remain in place for the next Congress. There are a lot of propositions on the ballot in Alabama, the most significant of which requires changes to election law to be adopted at least six months prior to a general election.
Posted in Elections, General Election Forecast, House of Representatives, Senate
Also tagged Connecticut, D.C., Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas
Comments Off on The Midterms — Preview (Part 2)
Missouri Senate Primary 2022
We are about five weeks out from the August 2 primary in Missouri. With Roy Blunt deciding that it is time to move on, there are multiple candidates in both party’s primary. While Missouri has been gradually moving to the right, there is a chance that Democrats could pull out a win, but a lot depends on what happens on August 2.
To some degree, the Republican primary in Missouri is an echo of what we have seen in Ohio and Pennsylvania. With a large number of candidates and no clear favorite, we are looking at the potential for a very close race which in turn means that Donald Trump could very easily impact the result by putting his thumb on the scale (as opposed to the recent primary in Alabama where Trump had little noticeable impact on the race when he first endorsed Mo Brooks, less impact when he rescinded that endorsement, and no impact when he decided to endorse Kate Britt at the last second to get a cheap win for his endorsement scorecard).
There are twenty-one people running for the Republican nomination. For the purposes of the Trump endorsement race, there are three groups of candidates: the field, the chase pack, and the lead pack. The field consists of fifteen candidates with no state-wide name recognition and no significant resources. Each of these candidates would be lucky to get 2-3% of the vote. But each vote for the field is a vote that is not going to the top six candidates.
Posted in General Election Forecast, Senate
Also tagged 2022 Senate Election, Eric Greitens
Comments Off on Missouri Senate Primary 2022
Redistricting — Missouri
The 2011 redistricting in Missouri gave us some very weird maps. In the Fifth District, we have the “dead lizard” district in which the Republican suburbs of Kansas City in Eastern Jackson County were carved out and moved in with the Sixth District (northern Missouri) which is mostly on the other side of the Missouri River. Meanwhile, some of the more Democratic suburbs of Kansas City (and the part of Kansas City north of the Missouri River) became the core of the Fifth District as well as what were some Democratic leaning counties east of Kansas City along the Missouri River that had historically been part of the Fourth District (western Missouri). In the Third District (eastern Missouri), you have the “claw” surrounding the St. Louis area on three sides. The Second District (suburban St. Louis) took in some of the more conservative suburbs of St. Louis in St. Charles County. The 2011 maps were the product of a General Assembly in which the Republicans were just shy of a supermajority and needed to get a small number of Democratic votes to overcome the Democratic governor’s veto.
In this next round of redistricting, not a lot has changed in terms of population. The First District (St. Louis and its inner suburbs) has continued to shrink relative to the rest of the state and will need about 35,000 people. The Eighth District (southeastern Missouri) will need around 7,000 people. Meanwhile, the Seventh District (southwestern Missouri including Springfield and Branson) will need to shed around 14,000 people. There are a lot of split precincts in the current map, so the exact surpluses of the remaining districts (and the exact shortfall in the Eighth) is hard to determine, but everything will need to be shifted somewhat.
What has changed is that there is now a Republican governor. While the Republicans do not have to make any concessions to Democrats to pass a bill, there will be some restraints caused by the need to comply with the Voting Rights Act. In other words, the Republicans are unable to carve up the two Democratic districts to get a clean 8-0 sweep of the state. But they can try to draw lines that improve the chances of keeping a 6-2 majority.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives
Also tagged 2020 Census, redistricting
Comments Off on Redistricting — Missouri
Redistricting 2021 — The Numbers
On Monday, four days ahead of its latest target date and almost four months behind the statutory date, the Census Bureau released the national and state-level results from the Census including the apportionment numbers that determine how many representatives each get. As can be expected, there are multiple different tables summarizing the data in different ways for us number geeks.
The bottom line table shows the apportionment population (both those living in the state and those residing overseas — like military personnel — who call that state home), the number of representatives that each state is getting, and the change in representation. We will get back to the change in a minute, but the big level number is that the apportionment population is slightly over 331 million. As such, the average size (mean) of each congressional district is just under 761 thousand. Alaska, Vermont, and Wyoming have fewer people than the average congressional district. While the apportionment formula does not work for calculating the population needed for the first representative, even Wyoming has enough population to be entitled to three-quarters of a representative.
If, D.C. and Puerto Rico were states, Puerto Rico would be just ahead of Utah (which has four representatives) and just behind Connecticut (which has five representatives) and D.C. would be between Vermont and Alaska. Given that Puerto Rico is only slightly larger than Utah (which was not close to getting a fifth representative and far enough behind Connecticut, Puerto Rico would be due for four representatives. If both were states, the five states that would lose a representative would have been Oregon, Colorado, and Montana (all of which gained a seat), California (which lost a seat), and Minnesota (which barely avoided losing a seat). The chart of priority values that allows us to consider the impact of adding Puerto Rico and D.C. also shows that Minnesota barely held onto its last seat and New York barely lost its seat. Apparently, given the formula, Minnesota would have lost that seat if it had 24 fewer people, and New York would have kept its seat if it had 89 more people. (The disparity in numbers is caused by the fact that the two states have different number of seats.
Posted in House of Representatives
Also tagged 2020 Census, apportionment, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, redistricting, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia
Comments Off on Redistricting 2021 — The Numbers
Election Night Preview — Part 7 (Referendums)
The first six posts in this series have focused mostly on federal elections with a handful of Governor’s races. Of course, there are also state legislative races, some local (mostly county) races, and referendums.
While I am sure that somebody has a complete list of every local bond issue or city charter issue, this post will focus on the state-wide issues. More specifically, this post will focus primarily on the changes that will make structural changes to the political system. It’s not that votes on legalization of marijuana or changes to the criminal justice system are unimportant, it’s just that many of these referendums are the results of the failure of the elected politicians to address these issues. and it’s the structural changes that may (or may not) make legislatures more responsive to these types of issues.
Several states are considering changes to the structure of elections In Massachusetts, voters will have the option of following in Maine’s footsteps by adopting ranked-choice voting for most state and federal elections (except for President).
Posted in 2020 General Election
Also tagged Alaska, campaign finance reform, Florida, Massachusetts, Puerto Rico, Ranked Choice Voting, redistricting, term limits, top-two primaries, Virginia
Comments Off on Election Night Preview — Part 7 (Referendums)