-
Recent Posts
Search
Welcome to DCW
Upcoming Events
7/15/24 - GOP Convention
TBD - Democratic Convention
11/5/24 - Election DayTools
Archives
Tag Cloud
2008 Democratic National Convention 2012 Democratic National Convention 2012 Republican National Convention 2016 Democratic National Convention 2016 Republican National Convention 2020 Census 2020 Democratic Convention 2024 Democratic Convention 2024 Republican Convention Abortion Affordable Care Act Alabama Arizona Bernie Sanders California Colorado Donald Trump First Amendment Florida Free Exercise Clause Free Speech Georgia Hillary Clinton Immigration Iowa Joe Biden Kansas Maine Marco Rubio Michigan Missouri Nevada New Hampshire North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania redistricting South Carolina Supreme Court Ted Cruz Texas United Kingdom Virginia Voting Rights Act WisconsinDCW in the News
Blog Roll
Site Info
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- tmess2 on Election Recap
- Anthony Uplandpoet Watkins on Election Recap
- Anthony Uplandpoet Watkins on Election Recap
- DocJess on Don’t think we’re getting a contested convention
- Matt on Dems to nominate Biden early to avoid GOP Ohio nonsense
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- August 2012
- November 2011
- August 2011
- January 2011
- May 2010
- January 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Categories
- 2019-nCoV
- 2020 Convention
- 2020 General Election
- 2020DNC
- 2024 Convention
- 2028 Convention
- Anti-Semitism
- Bernie Sanders
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Civil Rights
- Cleveland
- Climate Change
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Tips
- COVID-19
- Debates
- Delegate Count
- Delegates
- Democratic Debates
- Democratic Party
- Democrats
- DemsinPhilly
- DemsInPHL
- Disaster
- DNC
- Donald Trump
- Economy
- Elections
- Electoral College
- Federal Budget
- Freedom of the Press
- General Election Forecast
- GOP
- Healthcare
- Hillary Clinton
- Holidays
- Hotels
- House of Representatives
- Houston
- Identity Politics
- Impeachment
- Iowa Caucuses
- Jacksonville
- Joe Biden
- Judicial
- LGBT
- Mariner Pipeline
- Merrick Garland
- Meta
- Milwaukee
- Money in Politics
- Music
- National Security
- Netroots Nation
- New Yor
- New York
- NH Primary
- Notes from Your Doctor
- NoWallNoBan
- Pandemic
- Philadelphia
- PHLDNC2016
- Platform
- Politics
- Polls
- Presidential Candidates
- Primary and Caucus Results
- Primary Elections
- Public Health
- Rant
- Republican Debates
- Republicans
- Resist
- RNC
- Russia
- Senate
- Snark
- Student Loan Debt
- Sunday with the Senators
- Superdelegates
- Syria
- The Politics of Hate
- Uncategorized
- Vaccines
- War
- Weekly White House Address
Meta
Tag Archives: redistricting
Redistricting — New Jersey
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.democraticconventionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Vote-by-Jess.png?resize=297%2C300)
Currently, the Democrats hold ten of the twelve seats, but the map actually creates six Democratic districts, one Republican district, and five toss-up districts. At the present time, the overpopulated part of the state is the three districts that contain Newark and the suburbs of New York
City (the Eighth District, the Ninth District, and the Tenth District). the other district that is significantly overpopulated is the Twelfth District in the western part of the state around Princeton. All four of these districts are solidly Democratic. The two most underpopulated parts of the state are the two districts in the southern part of the state — the First (the southwest part of the state around Camden) and the Second (the rest of the south New Jersey). Given the population pattern in the state, all of the lines in the state are going to shift toward New York City.
As in other urbanized states, the Voting Rights Act will be some consideration. There are five minority-majority districts (Sixth, Eight, Ninth, Tenth, and Twelfth) with Hispanics being the largest group in two districts (the Eight — in which they are the majority — and the Ninth) and African Americans being a majority in one district (the Tenth).
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives, Uncategorized
Also tagged 2020 Census, New Jersey
Comments Off on Redistricting — New Jersey
Redistricting — Georgia
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.democraticconventionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/fireworks.jpg?resize=300%2C130)
Given that the safest Republican precincts are in districts that are short residents, and the most Democratic precincts are in the overpopulated parts of the other districts, Republicans are going to have to look carefully at how they move the lines. It is possible, however, to accomplish their main goals which are to regain the Sixth District (currently D+1) and the Seventh District (currently R+2). On paper this goal can be achieved. To accomplish this goal, Republicans will have to have adjoining districts trade precincts. A good example is Gwinnett County where you could some Democratic precincts move to the Tenth District and some Republican precincts move to the Seventh. For the Sixth District, the changes are much more blunt with the Eleventh District moving into Marietta in Cobb County to make up for the precincts that it will need to shed to the Thirteenth District (to allow the Thirteenth to shed precincts to the Third District). The real problem, for the Republicans are how much they can trust the numbers. Atlanta is a prime example of the suburbs changing quickly. And using anything other than the 2020 results may make these districts look redder than they actually are. Minimalist changes — combined with the current attempts at voter suppression in Georgia — may allow the Republicans to temporarily win back the Sixth District and the Seventh District, but the current trends will make it hard for the Republicans to keep them.
There are certainly some changes to my first round of maps that the Republicans could make which would involve adding precincts to districts that are already over in population and taking precincts from districts that are under in population (with other precincts moved around to compensate). The most likely option for this would be for the Ninth District to give up precincts in northern Forsyth County to the Sixth District and the Seventh District. The Ninth District would then get some additional precincts from the Tenth which would get precincts from the Fourth District and Seventh District in Gwinnett County (the Seventh would get some precincts from the Tenth in Gwinnett County). Finally, the Fourth District would get precincts from the Sixth District in DeKalb County. With some aggressive precinct selection, my final maps showed the Sixth and Seventh Districts as approximately R+7.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives, Uncategorized
Also tagged 2020 Census, Georgia
Comments Off on Redistricting — Georgia
Redistricting — Missouri
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.democraticconventionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/1970/01/mo-seal.gif?resize=236%2C236)
In this next round of redistricting, not a lot has changed in terms of population. The First District (St. Louis and its inner suburbs) has continued to shrink relative to the rest of the state and will need about 35,000 people. The Eighth District (southeastern Missouri) will need around 7,000 people. Meanwhile, the Seventh District (southwestern Missouri including Springfield and Branson) will need to shed around 14,000 people. There are a lot of split precincts in the current map, so the exact surpluses of the remaining districts (and the exact shortfall in the Eighth) is hard to determine, but everything will need to be shifted somewhat.
What has changed is that there is now a Republican governor. While the Republicans do not have to make any concessions to Democrats to pass a bill, there will be some restraints caused by the need to comply with the Voting Rights Act. In other words, the Republicans are unable to carve up the two Democratic districts to get a clean 8-0 sweep of the state. But they can try to draw lines that improve the chances of keeping a 6-2 majority.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives
Also tagged 2020 Census, Missouri
Comments Off on Redistricting — Missouri
Redistricting — Nevada
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.democraticconventionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/1970/01/lv2016logo.png?resize=275%2C277)
Before discussing the possible new lines, it is important to note one potential issue with the numbers that I am using. Besides the normal caution that, until the 2020 census numbers are released, we are relying on the 2019 population estimates, Nevada has a complicating factor. In almost every state, prisoners are counted as living in the prison for redistricting purposes. This gives a little bump to the rural counties that tend to want to have prisons and hurts the urban areas that are the source of many of the prisoners (as crime is associated with population density). In Nevada, we are talking an approximate prison population of around 10,000 with around half being in rural parts of Clark County and the other half being in other parts oft the state.
While it looks like the population growth was mostly in Clark County, because of the population movement within Clark County, the First District (Las Vegas) actually is projected to have the lowest population of the four districts — needing around 50-51,000 more people. On the other hand the Third District (southern Clark County) is around 68,000 overpopulated. Since the Third District is a toss-up district, the goal will be to move some Republicans from the Third to the First.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives
Also tagged 2020 Census, Nevada
Comments Off on Redistricting — Nevada
Redistricting — Utah
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.democraticconventionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/480px-Seal_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives.svg_.png?resize=300%2C300)
In Utah, there is an advisory commission which draws proposed maps, but the maps ultimately are drawn by the legislature. The maps are supposed to keep communities of interest intact and minimize county splits, but Utah Republicans have already shown a willingness to blow past those state law requirements in the 2010 maps. After 2010, the maps split Salt Lake County (large enough to have a single intact district) between three separate districts with Salt Lake City itself actually being in the Second District. These maps carefully divide the Democratic parts of Salt Lake County and Utah County between the three districts. In other words, the map in Utah is a perfect example of cracking.
If the map makers were trying to be proportional, it is possible to draw a district that combines the Democratic part of Salt Lake County with the Democratic part of neighboring Summit County to create a toss-up district that slightly favors the Democrats. In short, geography gives Democrats a chance at having one toss-up district in Utah, but the Republicans are unlikely to draw fair lines.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives
Also tagged 2020 Census, Utah
Comments Off on Redistricting — Utah
Redistricting — Nebraska
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.democraticconventionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/VotingBoothImage_0.jpg?resize=300%2C200)
After the last round of the redistricting, the Second District (Omaha) was a toss-up district. The First District (most of the rest of Eastern Nebraska including Lincoln) was a safe Republican district — around R+10. The Third District (the rest of the state including the Sioux City suburbs) is a solid Republican district — around R +30. On the map, the districts look like three semi-circles with the Second being the inner core surrounded by the First which is surrounded by the Third. It can be expected that the legislature will, where possible, try to move Republicans from the Third District into the First and from the First into the Second and to move Democrats from the Second into the First and from the First into the Third. While not absolutely required, in the last round of redistricting the Nebraska legislature tried to honor county lines. In the last round, that meant that the First District had a very slim sliver of Dixon County (otherwise in the Third District) and that Sarpy County was split into two halves (the eastern half in the First District and the western half in the Second District
As has been true in other states, urban and suburban areas have grown faster than rural areas. So the current estimates reflect that the Third District is underpopulated with the Second District being overpopulated. (The First District is slightly overpopulated.) The first, and easy step, is to move the part of the First that is in Dixon County into the Third District, but that is less than 800 people. Even without those people, the Third is over 36,000 short with the First having around 7,000 excess people and the Second having around 29,000 excess people.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives
Also tagged 2020 Census, Nebraska
Comments Off on Redistricting — Nebraska
Redistricting — Maine
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.democraticconventionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/480px-Seal_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives.svg_.png?resize=300%2C300)
The hard part of redistricting is that the process requires consensus. The initial draft is drawn by a bipartisan commission but has to be approved by a supermajority of the state legislature. That limits the opportunity for political gamesmanship.
Maine only has two congressional districts. Currently, the only split county in Maine is Kennebec County, home to the state capitol of Augusta. Currently, the First District is about 50% urban, but the Second District is only around 28% urban. As one would expect, the current population estimates for the districts has the First District with some excess population and the Second District is a little bit short. Assuming that the estimates are correct, that will require moving about 14,000 people from the First District into the Second District. The only question is which precincts to move, and what might control that decision is the requirement to avoid splitting political subdivisions.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives
Also tagged 2020 Census, Maine
Comments Off on Redistricting — Maine
Redistricting — Kansas
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.democraticconventionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/1970/01/Water-Tank-Cell-Tower-Well-Done-783799.jpg?resize=300%2C225)
Second, Kansas is one of the states with a part-time legislature. And the legislature has adjourned for the year. The Governor does have the power to call a special session to deal with redistricting. Given the Democratic minority, for the reasons discussed below, the Democrats have no incentive to call such a special session unless there is a consensus map supported by both parties. The Republicans could force a special session, but, like a veto override, it takes two-thirds of each house to sign a petition for a special session. As noted above, that will require every Republican in the Kansas House of Representatives to sign a petition which might not happen if the Republicans do not have maps that every Republican in the House supports.
Third, Kansas may be the rare state in which geography favors the Democrats. For over seventy years, western Kansas has had its own congressional seat as has the south central area around Wichita. But population change has slowly led the First District’s eastern boundary to drift eastward so that the First District now covers the vast majority of the state. The Democratic core of the state is in the Kansas City suburbs stretching out along I-70 toward the state capitol in Topeka and the University of Kansas in Lawrence. The First District and the Fourth District (the area around Wichita) is very red. As a result the current Second District (the eastern part of the state, including Topeka and Lawrence but not the Kansas City suburbs) and the Third District (the Kansas City suburbs) are essentially a swing to very slightly lean Republican area. And because the Republicans have only a slight advantage when the Second District and Third District are combined, any change to make the Third District redder would potentially put the Second District at risk. In short, barring significant changes, the Republicans can have a 3-0 edge with one toss-up that slightly favors the Democrats or a 2-0 edge with two toss-ups that slightly favor the Republicans.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives
Also tagged 2020 Census, Kansas
Comments Off on Redistricting — Kansas
Redistricting — Florida
Florida is the last of the states with the happy task of creating a new congressional district. In states in which legislatures draft the new lines, one of the motivating factors in the new lines is legislators thinking about their future plans. If your state house or state senate district (in other words, your base) is the core of a congressional district, you have a decent shot of winning that district if you choose to run. And the best time to run is when the congressional seat is open. While the decision of the incumbent to retire (or run for higher office) is one way that the seat can become open, a new seat is automatically an open seat.
Of course, new/open is not the number of the district. It’s the geography of a district. If an incumbent is seeking another term, they are most likely to file in the district that has their old district as the core even if the district has a new number. (unlike Texas which has just tended to give the “new” districts the new number leading to numbers leapfrogging all over the map, Florida has tended to have the districts flow somewhat logically from the northwest to the southeast.) If you are a member with influence wanting to run for Congress, you want: 1) no incumbent members of Congress residing in your district (although it is possible to run for a district that you do not live in); 2) no incumbent member of Congress who represented the majority of the district; 3) to have the entirety of your current legislative district in the congressional district; and 4) to have the district favor your party as strongly as possible. In theory, under the Florida Constitution, the new lines are not supposed to be drawn to unfairly favor either party or to protect incumbents. And while courts can intervene if the legislature goes too far, the odds that any partisan legislature will strictly obey those constitutional provisions are slim approaching none.
These types of concerns influence redistricting in every state. Unfortunately, to address those personal concerns of those drawing the lines would require knowing the local politics of every state. Instead, these articles assume that the main concern is the battle between maximizing partisan advantage (in those states with legislatures in charge) versus trying to draw proportional and competitive lines (in those states with commissions in charge). With the current map (drawn after the courts struck down the previous map as too partisan), the state is actually roughly proportional. The Republicans have a 16-10 advantage (with one Democratic seat vacant), but the map is theoretically 14-13.
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives
Also tagged 2012 Republican National Convention, 2020 Census, Florida
Comments Off on Redistricting — Florida
Redistricting — North Carolina
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.democraticconventionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Vote-by-Jess.png?resize=297%2C300)
Given that the current lines are what the Republicans drew after the previous lines were struck down in 2019, they probably represent a base map for what the new map will look like. (The software that I use to guesstimate maps does not have these new lines as an overlay. So I had to eyeball the lines from the map. There are a lot of split counties so the below combines districts with split counties together rather than trying to guess exactly how much each district is over or under the new average district — i.e. the target number. In addition, as noted in previous posts, as the official county, city, and precinct populations have not been released by the Census Bureau yet, this software uses the last population estimate from the Census Bureau which will be somewhat off.)
Over in the eastern part of the state, the First District (lean Democrat) and the Third District (solid Republican) are a combined 5,000-10,000 over the target number for a fourteen-district map. In other words, there might be a minor adjustment of where the lines are in Pitt County (currently split between the two) and some of Vance County (currently split between the First and the Fourth) will get bumped into the Fourth (which will then need to shed some population to the south and west).
Posted in Elections, House of Representatives
Also tagged 2012 Democratic National Convention, 2020 Census, North Carolina
Comments Off on Redistricting — North Carolina